Friday, January 06, 2006

I finally got around to "reading" Dan Brown's bestseller, The Da Vinci Code.  The controversy and/or hype surrounding the book has been swirling around for quite some time now, but for one reason or another I never got a chance to read it until now (technically speaking, I listened to it on CD.)

I have to admit, the storyline is incredibly intriguing and very addictive.  I actually found myself longing for my commute to and from work each day, knowing I'd unwrap a little more of the story with each drive.  The story itself unfolds rather quickly, but the more controversial aspects do not show up until about the half way point.

Suddenly, you are hit like a ton of bricks with the assertion that Jesus Christ was not only married, but had a child as well.  The book clearly blasphemes the Christian understanding of Christ's fully divine/fully human nature.  While I can certainly understand the objections the Vatican and many other Christian organizations have had to this work, one cannot deny the freedom Mr. Brown has to share his opinion. 

However, it seems that the general public is increasingly unaware of the fact that this is indeed a work of fiction, not fact.  That people are accepting this work as historically accurate is concerning, especially since the story's popularity has spawned a Tom Hanks film and even a video game.  The popularity of this novel has had its effect at the Louvre, where record attendance has been recorded, and has spawned pilgrammages to the Rossyln Chapel

Christian apologist (and staunch Calvinist) James White does a good job of discrediting Dan Brown's work on his blog.  Pretty interesting read for anyone discerning the truth behind what is otherwise a thorougly entertaining piece of fiction.

Monday, January 09, 2006 6:40:08 PM (E. Africa Standard Time, UTC+03:00)
Totally hypothetically speaking, Jesus could have been married and had a child and still have been fully divine/fully human, don't you think? He could have still been totally blameless. There is nothing inherently sinful about marriage and fatherhood.

Now, I'm not saying I agree with Dan Brown by any means, (actually, I'm not even sure Dan Brown agrees with the fictional story he wrote - it is fiction after all) and I have no idea what other assertions he makes in his book about Jesus. Of course, we don't believe Jesus had a wife and kids because that's not what the Gospels report. Just tossing out the hypothetical, that's all.
Monday, January 09, 2006 7:19:45 PM (E. Africa Standard Time, UTC+03:00)
Hey Mark!

Good point. I didn't expand on my thoughts in my post as I should have. Theoretically, Jesus COULD have had a child and wife and still been blameless, yes. The blasphemy, however, comes when Dan Brown makes the assertion that Christ was merely a moral "teacher" and in fact was not divine. He also makes claim that the Church has covered up the "divine goddess" status of Mary Magdalene. Basically, the book denies the very foundational belief of what makes one a Christian. Whether or not this is Brown's personal view, I'm not sure, but certainly the book is an attack on Christianity. However, like I said, its definitely an interesting read...you should check it out.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview

Theme design by Jelle Druyts

Pick a theme: